Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Powered by FeedBurner

« Mercy Abortions: What Dr. Tiller Did? | Main | Texas is Anti Choice »

January 29, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a010535b226ed970c0120a826b1d9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Right Decision for Scott Roeder:

1 Favorite

  • TCFundsAbortion

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Joe

It was not a just verdict because he should have been convicted of a lesser charge than first degree murder.

Obviously, one can use force as a last resort to save the life of any human being threatened with death, but it must be an absolute last resort. This was clearly not an absolute last resort as Tiller was killed while in church and was not in a position at that point to threaten anyone.

However, there were severe mitigating circumstances. George Tiller was a criminal child killer who had destroyed 60,000 human lives and would have continued killing for many years to come. The federal and state governments had done and would do nothing to stop him. Scott Roeder did not kill for personal gain but to attempt to save the lives of unborn children who otherwise would probably be killed with no one intervening in any way to save them.

Therefore, although his action was unjustified, the mitigating circumstances would dictate that he be convicted of, say, manslaughter and given a 2 year sentence or something similar, rather than life in prison for first degree murder.

The comments to this entry are closed.